12 angry men legal issues

What kinds of attributions were used by the jurors and how did these attributions affect their initial judgment of the boy? For example, Fonda commented on how the boy had been slapped around all his life and was treated poorly.

Are you sure that you want to delete this answer?

Important Legal Terms for "12 Angry Men": High School Lesson Plan

Yes Sorry, something has gone wrong. Very challenging social situation to be the last hold-out when all the other jurors are in agreement.

A test of strength, patience and personal morals and ethics. Weighing evidence, too, a tough business. First, you have to decide whether it has an air of reality and if so, whether it's sufficient to find the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

If, for example, you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused handled the bloody knife it's not enough to convict him for murder.

The prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that all the elements of the offence as described in the relevant legislation.

Jurors have to follow judge's instructions on how much weight to give each piece of evidence. Yes, he had the murder weapon but did he intend to use it against his victim? There must be intention which is often difficult to ascertain.

Related Questions

Jurors typically want to get the hell home so there is an incentive to reach a result early. There is also pressure on them to come to unanimous agmt to avoid the trouble and expense of a new trial. And of course the accused who is presumed innocent hopes they won't railroad him.1.

Identify the facts: 18 year old boy on trial for murdering his father. Eighth juror says not guilty, eleven other jurors say guilty.

12 Angry men notes & discussion. 1. What kinds of attributions were used by the jurors and how did these attributions affect their initial judgment of the boy? 12 Angry Men: Kasey Kennedy CRJ Home; Ethical Dilemmas; Analysis; 1. Identify the facts: 18 year old boy on trial for murdering his father. Eighth juror says not guilty, eleven other jurors say guilty. Very little evidence against the boy. 12 Angry Men Questions and Answers. The Question and Answer section for 12 Angry Men is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

Very little evidence against the boy. University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 12 Angry Men: An Analysis of How Law, Science, and Individual Persistence Saved DNA Profiling. Sep 04,  · 12 Angry Men: The Law Student’s Review.

Posted on September 4, September 4, by Pratiek Sparsh Samantara. In my project, I will try to scrutinize these aspects and also attempt to provide an understanding in the legal processes depicted in 12 Angry Men. About the Movie. 12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose.

Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and values.

12 Angry Men: Kasey Kennedy CRJ Home; Ethical Dilemmas; Analysis; 1. Identify the facts: 18 year old boy on trial for murdering his father. Eighth juror says not guilty, eleven other jurors say guilty. Very little evidence against the boy. Get an answer for 'What are the significant legal issues/concepts in the Twelve Angry Men film?' and find homework help for other Twelve Angry Men questions at eNotes.